Monday 27 November 2023

NOTA ALAM MELAYU : THE MALAYS

Resource: QUORA.COM

Since Orang Asli originate from the Malay Archipelago, are they not Malays?

Malays which comprise around 60% of Malaysian population today are mostly ‘constitutional Malays’.

According to Article 160; ‘A Malay is a person who professes the religion of Islam, habitually speaks the Malay language, conforms to Malay custom and (a) was before Merdeka Day born in the Federation or in Singapore or born of parents one of whom was born in the Federation or in Singapore, or is on that day domiciled in the Federation or in Singapore; or (b) is the issue of such a person;

Orang Asli on the other hand, officially comprised of 18 sub-ethnics that come from these 3 main ethnics:

  • Semang or Negrito (Sub ethnics: Kensiu, Kintak, Lanoh, Jahai, Mendriq, Bateq)
  • Senoi (Sub ethnics: Temiar, Semai, Semoq, Beri, Jahut, Mahmeri, Che Wong)
  • Proto-Malay (Sub ethnics: Orang Kuala, Orang Kanaq, Orang Seletar, Jakun, Semelai, Temuan)

Some of them are Muslims, others are Animists, Christians, Hindus or Buddhists. (Non-Muslims are automatically disqualified as Malays by law)

They communicate using their own language which are either Austro-asiactic or Austronesian.

Sometimes, they like to whistle and make sounds using their lips to communicate with each other.

(Man, they sure are amazing whistlers)

Both Malays and Orang Aslis are deemed Bumiputras by constitution.

To answer one of the posters’ question, yes, Orang Aslis and those ethnics in Sabah/Sarawak are actually more ‘native’ than the Malays (which are mostly Malays because the book says so) and they are the ones who should be getting more of the perks (going by ‘who came here first’ basis)

The constitutional Malays should be humble, accept the fact and stop calling Chinese and Indians as pendatang (immigrants).
- Hassanul Hadi Zakaria
How old is the Malay Civilisation?

The oldest archaeological evidence of Ancient Malay Civilization was found in Kedah specifically the Lembah Bujang Archaeological site on the bank of Sungai Merbok. The site was dated all the way back to 535 BC. This means that Malay Civilization is 2500 to 3000 years old. There are evidence that concludes that earlier Malay City States to have also existed. The cradle of Tamadun Melayu was the Northern Malay Peninsular which is mostly modern day Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan, Terengganu and the Pattani Region of Thailand. It was once thaught that Malay Civilization was an offshoot of Vedic (Indian) Civilization however the earliest evidence of Indians in the Nusantara Region only appeared in the 6th Century AD. Pre-Hindu-Buddhist Malay Civilization consist of sovereign City States (kinda like the Greeks) and as Indian influence spreads, the small states slowly grew and gobble up each other and slowly Malay Civilization spreads southwards replacing the Austronesian Proto-Malays and inland replacing the Austroasiatic speaking Australoid Aslian Tribes and since Malays, like other Austronesians are inherently seafarers, they expand into Eastern Sumatra and the Coast of Kalimantan (Borneo).

Map of Alam Melayu (Malay Reich) where the Red Circle was the Cradle of Malay Civilization.

Source:

[1]Malays (ethnic group) - Wikipedia

[2]Bujang Valley - Wikipedia

(Putera Iskandar Zainuddin > B.A. in Bachelor of Science in Physics with Honors & PhilosophyUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR)

When did the Malay Civilisation started?

The most popular pre-Islamic Malay Kingdom is probably Srivijaya but it’s actually among the last Malay Kingdoms before Malays embraced Islam. Srivijaya rose quite late in the 7th century.

There were many older Malay Kingdoms in the region and they usually arose in the peninsula. Kadaram/Kataha could be found as early as 1AD. Langkasuka was found in 2AD. and other Kingdoms/polities such as Chih Tu, Kolathana, Gangganegara and so on which were older than Srivijaya.

So I guess Malay civilisation started as early as the 1st century.
(Nafran Naif > Former Librarian at Public Libraries

Do Malaysian Malays really come from Indonesia?
Simple Answer: No, because Indonesia didnt exist back then before 1945.

Long Answer: Yes and No (because culture and genes evolved seperately);
  1. No, genetically speaking, the people that will be known as the Melayu have long settled the Peninsular for 2 to 3 thousand years. They were the product of interbreeding between the Austronesian Proto Sumatrans (they were a Batak-like people) and the Native Orang Asli. Back then, those people althrough they have the same genetic makeup as the Melayu will be (aside later Indian Arab and Chinese influences) but they did not called themselves Melayu and are similar to the Proto Malay Orang Asli people in Southern parts of Tanah Melayu, the Orang Laut and native tribes of Sabah and Sarawak.
  2. Yes, culturally and linguistically speaking. The ancestor of the Malay Language split of with the ancestor of the Ibanic Language. The speakers than began to colonise the Coast of Kalimantan before moving out to colonise Eastern Sumatra and finally spreading to the Peninsular where they unify most of the Proto Malay tribes (and even assimilate various Orang Asli Tribes) of the Peninsular. The reason why Ancient Malay spread is probally because of trade since Austronesian expansion throughout SE Asia was mostly because of trade where Bahasa Melayu Kuno became a Lingua Franca. Some of these tribes (especially in the North) benifitted a lot from trade and started to urbanise and they found kingdoms like Langkasuka and Kedah. The Indians then came btw 1500 to 2000 years ago and Malay Civilisation spread to Sumatra where a Kingdom was founded on the Banks of a Rivier called Sungai Melayu which was Old Javanese meaning “to accelerate”. When Malacca came to power, the people who speak these set of closely related language called themselves Orang Melayu.
  3. Yes (AGAIN !), remember the Kingdom that was founded on the Banks of the Melayu river ? There is a theory that the Kingdom was a centre of the ancient Malay Kingdom of Sri Vijaya. When the kingdom fell to the Majapahit, the last prince of the Kingdom, Parameswara escaped to establish Melaka and “Melayu” was what the Malaccans called the now forgotten Kingdom of Sri Vijaya until it was rediscovered by a French Archeologist named George Cœdès in the 1920s where he named the kingdom Sri Vijaya. Anyways, the theory goes that the Malaccans saw themselves as the heir of Sri Vijaya and decided to call themselves Melayu and the name stuck as Sri Vijaya fades away from the Malay Collective Memory.
(Putera Iskandar Zainuddin - B.A in Bachelor of Science in Physics with Honors & PhilosophyUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR) (Expected 2023)