Credit: SEA Heritage & History
Is ๐๐ก๐ข๐ง๐'๐ฌ claim of ๐๐ข๐ง๐-๐๐๐ฌ๐ก ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ based on ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ relevant in modern times today? ๐๐ง ๐๐๐๐ญ, ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ controlled first the Nine-Dash Line before China accepted the transfer of navigation technology across the vast ocean via the Southeast Asian maritime people / Islanders (๐๐ฎ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ง).
Did you know that Chinese maritime shipping did not exist until the end of the Song dynasty, before that their ships were river ships. However, large Austronesian merchant ships that docked in Chinese ports with four sails were recorded by scholars as early as the Han Dynasty (206 BC – 220 AD). They are called kunlun bo or kunlun po (ๅดๅด่ถ, lit. "ship of the dark-skinned Kunlun people"). They were ridden by Chinese Buddhist pilgrims for trips to South India and Sri Lanka.
The 3rd century book "Strange Things from the South" (ๅๅท็ฐ็ฉๅฟ) by Wan Chen (่ฌ้) describes one of these archipelago ships as capable of carrying 600–700 people along with more than 10,000 hu (ๆ) cargo ( according to various interpretations, means 250–1000 tonnes—600 tonnes deadweight according to Manguin). The large ship is more than 50 meters long and 5.2–7.8 meters high above the water. When viewed from above the ships look like topped galleries. He describes the ship's sail design as follows:
๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ โ๐๐, ๐ ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ก ๐ข๐ (๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ ) ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐คโ๐๐โ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ค ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐. (...) ๐โ๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ฆ, ๐๐ข๐ก ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐๐ฆ, ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐, ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก. ๐โ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐๐, ๐กโ๐๐๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐กโ๐๐, ๐ ๐ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐. ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ก'๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐, (๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ) ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ . ๐โ๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐, ๐คโ๐๐โ ๐๐๐๐๐ค๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐กโ๐๐, ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ก๐ฆ ๐กโ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ โ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ โ๐๐โ ๐๐๐ ๐ก. ๐โ๐ข๐ ๐กโ๐๐ ๐ ๐ โ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐ฃ๐๐ , ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐คโ๐๐โ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐ค๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐โ โ๐๐โ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ . — ๐๐๐ ๐ถโ๐๐,
The South Chinese junks were based on the multi-bladed and keeled Southern/Austronesian country ships (known to the Chinese as po, actually from the Javanese word "prau" or Malay "perahu"—formerly a big ship). South China junks exhibit Austronesian characteristics: V-shaped, double-ended hulls with keel, and use of tropical wood. This was in contrast to the northern Chinese junks, which were developed from flat-hulled riverboats. Northern Chinese ships had a flat bottom hull, no keel, no frame (only watertight bulkheads), box/square-shaped stern and bow, made of pine or spruce, and the boards were fastened with iron nails or pins.
๐ญ๐ฌ๐๐ต ๐๐ผ ๐ญ๐ฏ๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ (๐ฆ๐ผ๐ป๐ด ๐ฑ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐๐๐)
The Song dynasty developed the first junks based on Southeast Asian ships. During this era they had also adopted the sails of Austronesian junks. Song dynasty ships, both commercial and military, became the backbone of the next Yuan dynasty's navy. In particular, the Mongol invasion of Japan (1274–84), as well as the Mongol invasion of Java (both failed), largely depended on their newly acquired Song naval capabilities. Worcester estimates that the Yuan junks were 11 m (36 ft) wide and more than 30 m (100 ft) long. In general they do not have a keel, front crest, or back crest. They do have a midboard, and watertight bulkheads to strengthen the hull, which adds to the weight. Further excavations show that this type of ship was common in the 13th century. Using a comparison between the number of soldiers and ships, Nugroho concluded that each ship could carry a maximum capacity of 30 or 31 people, while using the data presented by John Man it would yield a capacity of 29–44 people per ship. David Bade estimates a capacity of 20 to 50 people per ship for ships used on expeditions to Java.
---------
If China claims the nine-dash line based on history. Supposedly, the Indonesians who have the right to inherit the Kunlun nation should have the right to claim the NINE-DASH LINE, because they were the first to control this sea area, the peak of its glory was in the era of the Sriwijaya Empire. the Chinese were very late in developing their first Ocean ship, which was only in the 12th century AD, while the Indonesians had sailed in the ocean before AD.
Claiming ocean areas based on ancient history is absurd and irrelevant to geopolitical developments.
Reference:
- Heng, Derek (2019). "Ships, Shipwrecks, and Archaeological Recoveries as Sources of Southeast Asian History". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History: 1–29. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.97.
- L. Pham, Charlotte Minh-Hร (2012). Asian Shipbuilding Technology. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education. ISBN 978-92-9223-413-3.
- Kang, Heejung (2015). "Kunlun and Kunlun Slaves as Buddhists in the Eyes of the Tang Chinese" (PDF). Kemanusiaan. 22 (1): 27–52.
- Dick-Read, Robert (2005). The Phantom Voyagers: Evidence of Indonesian Settlement in Africa in Ancient Times. Thurlton.
- Manguin, Pierre-Yves (September 1980). "The Southeast Asian Ship: An Historical Approach". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 11 (2): 266–276. doi:10.1017/S002246340000446X. JSTOR 20070359.
- Christie, Anthony (1957). "An Obscure Passage from the "Periplus: ฮฮฮฮฮฮฮฮฯฮฉฮฮคฮ ฮคฮ ฮฮฮฮฮฃฮคฮ"". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 19: 345–353 – via JSTOR.
- "Strange Things of the South", Wan Chen, dari Robert Temple
- Manguin, Pierre-Yves. 2012. “Asian ship-building traditions in the Indian Ocean at the dawn of European expansion”, in: Om Prakash and D. P. Chattopadhyaya (eds), History of science, philosophy, and culture in Indian Civilization, Volume III, part 7: The trading world of the Indian Ocean, 1500-1800, pp. 597-629. Delhi, Chennai, Chandigarh: Pearson.
- Rafiek, M. (Desember 2011). "Kapal dan Perahu dalam Hikayat Raja Banjar: Kajian Semantik". Borneo Research Journal. 5: 187–200.
- Sunyoto, Agus (2017). Atlas Walisongo. South Tangerang: Pustaka IIMaN.
- Worcester, G. R. G. (1947). The Junks and Sampans of the Yangtze, A Study in Chinese Nautical Research, Volume I: Introduction; and Craft of the Estuary and Shanghai Area. Shanghai: Order of the Inspector General of Customs.
- Man, John (2012). Kublai Khan: The Mongol King Who Remade China. Reading: Random House. ISBN 9781446486153.
- Bade, David W. (2013). Of Palm Wine, Women and War: The Mongolian Naval Expedition to Java in the 13th Century. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Credits to Owners
C&P: 12/11/2025: 9.44 p.m